Simulating Corporate Marginal Income Tax Rates and Implications for Corporate Debt Policy
نویسنده
چکیده
We study several important tax-related issues related to the measurement and use of corporate marginal tax rates. First, we develop an AR(1) method to simulate corporate marginal income tax rates and demonstrate that the AR(1) model improves upon the extant random walk and bin approaches. The new AR(1) approach captures firm-specific features, including mean-reversion in taxable income. Second, we calculate marginal tax benefit curves, which are the functions that determine the marginal tax rate for different levels of interest deduction. We integrate under tax benefit functions calculated using the AR(1), random walk, and bin approaches and find roughly similar implications for all methods, namely that the tax benefits of debt average about 13% of book asset value, gross of all costs. Third, we investigate the “kink” in benefit functions based on each of the three methods, that is, where the kink represents the point where marginal tax benefits begin to decline. The kink is sometimes used to infer how conservatively companies use debt. Our analysis indicates that implications about debt conservatism based on the AR(1) model are relatively robust to specification choices, while implications based on the bin model are sensitive to the specification. Overall, we find that all three models provide roughly similar implications about how aggressively companies appear to use debt once reasonable modifications are made to the debt conservatism metric. Importantly, controlling for a company’s interest usage, we find that variables commonly used to proxy for the costs of debt only partially explain that company’s kink (i.e., common cost variables only partially explain why some firms appear to use debt conservatively). We thank Alon Brav, Cam Harvey, Mark Leary, Per Olsson, Michael Roberts, Bob Winkler and the Texas Tax Reading Group for helpful feedback. Kim gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Kwanjeong Educational Foundation. Any errors are our own.
منابع مشابه
DO TAXES AFFECT CORPORATE DEBT POLICY? Evidence from U.S. Corporate Tax Return Data
This paper uses U.S. Statistics of Income (SOI) Corporate Income Tax Returns balance sheet data on all corporations, to estimate the effects of changes in corporate tax rates on the debt policies of firms of different sizes. Small firms face very different tax rates than larger firms, and relative tax rates have also changed frequently over time, providing substantial information to identify ta...
متن کاملTaxes and Horizontal Corporate Group (Keiretsu) Affiliation:
This paper investigates the effect of horizontal corporate group (keiretsu) affiliation on effective tax rates in Japan. After controlling for variables that affect corporate income taxes, keiretsu firms have lower effective tax rates than independent firms. These findings are attributed to political power and the unique corporate governance mechanism of keiretsu groups. Furthermore, horizontal...
متن کاملUp or down? Capital income taxation in the United States and the United Kingdom
Empirical evidence suggests that the E¤ective Marginal Tax Rate (EMTR) on income from capital has increased considerably in both the United States and the United Kingdom over the period 1982-2005. This evidence contradicts the corporate tax literature which predicts that the EMTR should instead fall over time as a result of increasing international capital mobility and higher tax competition be...
متن کاملPortfolio Choice and Corporate Financial Policy When There Are Tax-Intermediating Dealers
Miller (1977) emphasized that optimal corporate financial policy depends on the tax rates facing the firm as well as the tax treatment accorded bondand stock-holders. In equilibrium, firms will issue claims that are held by the full spectrum of investors, from tax-exempt institutional investors to heavily taxed individuals. However, dealers are tax neutral institutions that can buy corporate se...
متن کاملA Critique of Plesko’s “An Evaluation of Alternative Measures of Corporate Tax Rates”
In a recent working paper, Plesko (1999) uses confidential tax return data to evaluate alternative measures of corporate average and marginal tax rates and concludes “The results suggest that commonly used measures of average tax rates provide little insight about annual corporate tax burdens, and may introduce substantial bias into statistical models. Marginal tax rate proxies perform better, ...
متن کامل